File talk:New mainland political.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Protest-Stand Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --~~~")
 
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr|talk]])
:::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
Aw, man, you should have kept the blood red for Nia-Aglare, I chose it intentionally. [[User:Detarame|Detarame]] ([[User talk:Detarame|talk]]) 00:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:13, 24 March 2018

I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --Msallen (talk)

I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --Msallen (talk)
The nature of the thing means that someone will claim that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -slitherrr (talk)
Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --Msallen (talk)

Aw, man, you should have kept the blood red for Nia-Aglare, I chose it intentionally. Detarame (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)