File talk:New mainland political.jpg: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr|talk]])
::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr|talk]])
::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. It only sort of interesting that the fresian claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])
177

edits

Navigation menu