File talk:New mainland political.jpg - Revision history

Detarame at 00:13, 24 March 2018

2018-03-24T00:13:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 24 March 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.		: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: Aw, you should have kept blood red for Nia-~~Agliare~~, ~~though. That blood red was chosen~~ intentionally. [[User:Detarame\|Detarame]] ([[User talk:Detarame\|talk]]) 00:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)		::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
			:::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

			Aw, man, you should have kept the blood red for Nia-Aglare, I chose it intentionally. [[User:Detarame\|Detarame]] ([[User talk:Detarame\|talk]]) 00:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Detarame at 00:12, 24 March 2018

2018-03-24T00:12:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 24 March 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.		: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: ~~The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't~~ have ~~real control over it~~. ~~Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -~~[[User:~~Slitherrr~~\|~~slitherrr~~]] ([[User talk:~~Slitherrr~~\|talk]])		::: Aw, you should have kept blood red for Nia-Agliare, though. That blood red was chosen intentionally. [[User:Detarame\|Detarame]] ([[User talk:Detarame\|talk]]) 00:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
	:::~~: Yeah~~, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] (~~[[User talk:Msallen\|talk]]~~)

Msallen at 11:39, 23 March 2018

2018-03-23T11:39:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 23 March 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. It only sort of interesting that the fresian claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

Msallen at 11:37, 23 March 2018

2018-03-23T11:37:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 23 March 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
			::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. It only sort of interesting that the fresian claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

Slitherrr at 00:43, 23 March 2018

2018-03-23T00:43:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 23 March 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.		: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
			::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])

Msallen at 22:44, 22 March 2018

2018-03-22T22:44:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 22 March 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.		: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

Msallen at 22:43, 22 March 2018

2018-03-22T22:43:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 22 March 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.		: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.
			:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

Detarame at 03:04, 22 March 2018

2018-03-22T03:04:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 22 March 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
			: I agree. That middle area is probably the remains of the Bloody-Thirty-Nine which probably turned into warlord country borderlands.

Msallen: Created page with "I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --~~~"

2018-03-18T22:08:28Z

Created page with "I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --~~~"

New page

I think flannary and fresia should be closer. Maybe hakan and fresia could be closer around those rivers they favor now. I definitely made things sparser. --[[User:Msallen|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 23 March 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
	::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. It only sort of interesting that the fresian claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. Its only sort of interesting that the fresian emperor claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. I agree that if nations self-identified they'd have much larger zones of control and would probably overlap instead of gap. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 23 March 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])		:: Do you like where they're at now? Should they touch, or have a straight border? Also, I just ended up recoloring all the unnamed states red and leaving them at that for now. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])
	::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])		::: The nature of the thing means that someone will ''claim'' that area even if they don't have real control over it. Do you want these maps to represent "real" zones of control, or each state's aspirations of itself? -[[User:Slitherrr\|slitherrr]] ([[User talk:Slitherrr\|talk]])
			::: Yeah, we were talking about that during the mattiverse game wrt straight borders. I think from a player/gm perspective, the real borders are a lot more interesting and relevant. It only sort of interesting that the fresian claims he's "lord of the grenrushk" even though 70% of it (including cities) is inundated with servitors. --[[User:Msallen\|Msallen]] ([[User talk:Msallen\|talk]])